Review of "Gallipoli," by Les Carlyon
Review of
Gallipoli,
by Les Carlyon ISBN 0732911281
Five out of five stars
Definitive history of the Gallipoli campaign
World War I is
known for the massive assaults where hundreds of thousands of men faced off
against each other in deeply entrenched positions. Battles were generally
exercises in masses of men charging across open territory trying to dislodge
and defeat men with machine guns. Tens of thousands died on both sides in a
single battle and on the western front, the front line rarely moved more than a
mile or two. Most attacks were prefaced by massive artillery bombardments that
sometimes lasted for days.
The Allied
attack on the Turkish territory on the west side of the Dardanelles straight
was a sideshow front relative to the battles that took place on the eastern and
western fronts. Yet, it did have the potential for the highest reward for the
risk of any of the other fronts. For if the Allies would have been able to take
control of European territory of the Ottoman Empire, the Turks would have
likely sued for peace. With the Ottoman Empire out of the war, Russia and the
Allies would have been able to move freely through the straits and the Black
Sea. Badly needed military equipment and supplies could then have been
transported to Russia.
Therefore, Winston
Churchill was probably right in his insistence that the Allies carry out the
attack that is now known as the Gallipoli campaign. However, in a war known for
the simple-minded incompetence of the commanders, this battle was probably the
most poorly led and executed of the entire war. It ended with an ignominious withdrawal
by the Allied forces.
As Carlyon
states, the attacking forces largely didn’t know anything about the terrain,
climate or morale of the opposing Turkish forces. They carried out the invasion
lacking vital munitions, food, water and medical people and equipment. Despite
the obvious lessons for the need for artillery support to destroy defensive
positions, the attackers had only a minimum amount of artillery. They also
suffered from the arrogance of believing that when they arrived the Turkish
forces would simply retreat in terror, leading to an easy victory.
This book is
the definitive description of this battle, how it was conceived, conducted and
finally abandoned with heavy loss. Carlyon also describes the morale and
motivation of the troops of the Australian and New Zealand contingents. While independent,
at the time the British ties were still strong, and these men willingly
enlisted to fight and die in one of the most pointless fronts of the war. It is
easy to come away from reading this book surprised that Winson Churchill was
able to eventually rise from the ashes of this debacle.
Comments
Post a Comment