Review of "If the South Had Won the Civil War," by Mackinlay Kantor
Review of
If the South Had Won the Civil War,
by Mackinlay Kantor
Five out of five stars
A very plausible outcome
The first thing
that must be said here is that the word “won” in the title means that there was
a Confederate victory which led to a negotiated end with the United States
being split into the Union and Confederacy. The states added to the Confederacy
were Kentucky and Maryland and Washington D. C. was no longer the capital of
the truncated United States.
The initial
premise leading to the change in outcome is that General Grant was killed in a horse
riding accident. Without his strong direction at the critical time of the
battles along the Mississippi river, the Union forces there were routed. A similar
event took place in the battlefields of the area of Virginia, Maryland and
Pennsylvania. The Confederate forces under Lee defeated the Union forces,
leading to their marching on Washington D. C. Under Confederate protection,
President Lincoln was moved out of the capital into Virginia where he resigned
the presidency. Once the fighting ended, there was a peace treaty where the capital
of the Union was moved to Columbus, Ohio, which was renamed Columbia.
This is a plausible
outcome, for it was never possible for the Confederacy to win a complete victory
with occupation of the Union. Once the disunion was complete, the worldwide forces
against slavery, the geopolitical realities of the North American continent and
the relative industrialization of the Union states led to dramatic changes.
The Union
continued to expand westward with the expanding railroad network and the
widespread movement of people from the Union into the western section what
would become the United States. Those people kept their associations to the Union
and had no use for slavery. The cattle industry in Texas had no rail
connections to their main market in the Union so they drove their cattle to the
rail connections in Kansas where they could be marketed to companies in the
Union. This led to political conflict between Texas and the Confederacy.
The best
alternative history is based on events where a different outcome had
significant events and those consequences are plausible. That is the case here,
it is conceded that 1863 was the last year where the Confederacy had a chance
to win their separation from the Union. Once Grant dies, the driving force for
a Union victory along the Mississippi is gone. Kantor then devises a thread of
historical consequences that have a high probability of taking place once you
accept a negotiated end to the Civil War.
Comments
Post a Comment