Review of "Perry Mason: The Case of the Perjured Parrot," by Erle Stanley Gardner
Review of
Perry Mason: The Case of the Perjured
Parrot, by Erle Stanley Gardner
Four out of five stars
A bit of a break from the Mason formula
The Perry Mason
stories penned by Erle Stanley Gardner follow a basic formula with many of the
same auxiliary characters to add the proper ambience. In this case, there is a
bit of a modification of this formula. Seargent Holcomb is in his usual anti-Mason
state of mind, despite the many cases behind them where Mason led the process
of finding the real killer(s), Holcomb still makes it clear that he can’t stand
Mason and will do all he can to pin him down in something he can be arrested
for.
However, in
this story, there is the county Sheriff Barnes, a man that is smart enough to
recognize Mason’s skills at deriving the truth in a sea of confusion has proven
useful. Therefore, when wealthy Fremont Sabin is killed in a remote cabin and
Mason appears at the murder scene, Barnes is willing to let Mason be part of
the process.
The parrot is
one that talks, yet of course it can’t create its’ own dialog but only repeats
what it hears. Mason is hired by Charles Sabin, the son of Fremont, with the
goal being the determination of who committed the murder. There are many
logical suspects, a divorce that may or not have been legal, apparent bigamy and
a gross inconsistency in the evidence. Mason ends up also representing Helen Monteith,
a library worker that is the most logical suspect. She is directly linked to
the murder weapon, an old pistol that she removed from the library.
As a Perry
Mason story by Gardner, there are many distractors and pathways through the
facts as Mason and Della Street plow through many “facts” that turn out to be
less than as solid as they first appeared. Of course, it is Mason that finally
puts it all together and determines what is the one big lie that directly leads
to the identity of the killer.
The apparent
case of bigamy is resolved in a less than solid manner. It turns out that there
was a very solid, albeit weak explanation. This is a good, but not great Perry
Mason story. What makes it better than good is the presence of Sheriff Barnes,
a man that is more concerned with identifying the guilty than with salving his
ego for failing to win in a battle of wits with Mason.
Comments
Post a Comment