Review of "Faster," by James Gleick
Review of
Faster, by James Gleick
ISBN 0679408371
Five out of five stars
Proof that things are accelerating
Nearly everyone
talks about how things in life are moving faster and in this book, Gleick gives
many examples that it is not an illusion. One of the best examples is when an
air traffic controller instructs a pilot to perform a maneuver in a minute.
When it is not done quickly, he raises his voice and says, “I meant a New York
minute, not a hillbilly minute!”
One of the main
things that have been sped up is the amount of information that is packed into
videos. The film industry is constantly pushing the envelope to determine the
high-speed limits of our perception. Although I am a lifelong fan of comic
books, I find it very difficult to watch the latest superhero movies as I
become overwhelmed with the imagery content.
I generally
watch the network news in the evening, and I have noticed how the remote
correspondents talk much faster than they used to. When the anchor cuts to
them, they immediately begin their report and when done, they quickly snap it
back to the anchor. One can easily visualize the clock in front of the
correspondent counting down their allotted seconds.
My favorite chapter
has the title, “A Millisecond Here, a Millisecond There.” It opens with what I
consider the signature line of the book, “Between thoughts, there are gaps –
very, very short gaps. Can this time be used?” Decades ago, efficiency experts
worked diligently in order to shave seconds off of operations or ways in which
seconds of dead time could be utilized. In the world described by Gleick, that
time is now measured in thousandths of a second.
Published in
1999, this book is of course dated in the sense that many things have changed,
from the development of the smartphone to various forms of social media. Yet, in
it Gleick had proven to be prescient, things do indeed move faster now than
even twenty years ago. The continued increase in the speed of things must of
course become asymptotic to the theoretical maximum.
Comments
Post a Comment